Eplet-based virtual PRA increases transplant probability in highly-sensitized patients.

BACKGROUND: The reduced access of highly-sensitized (HS) patients to kidney transplantation (KTx) is one of the major challenges for transplant community. Therefore, the aim of our study was to estimate the impact of three different vPRA calculations, assessed traditionally and using eplet-based analysis, in donor offers. METHODS: At 01-01-2020, 157 HS patients are waitlisted for deceased donor KTx and were included in this study. Total vPRA (vPRAt) was calculated considering all patient allosensitization history, using 1 k MFI cut-off. Current vPRA (vPRAc) refers only to the last year SAB assays, using 1 k MFI cut-off. For eplet vPRA (vPRAe) every SAB assay was analyzed by HLAMatchmaker and HLAfusion software. Matching runs have been performed taking vPRA calculation as unacceptable antigens (UAs). RESULTS: All patients had at least one previous sensitizing event and patients with 100% vPRA were predominantly candidates for retransplantation (P < 0.001), had higher PRA-CDC (P < 0.001), and longer dialysis vintage waiting time (P < 0.001). Inter-group movement analysis between vPRA measures showed that 70 (45%), 124 (79%) and 80 (51%) patients were reclassified to a lower group when considering vPRAt to vPRAc, vPRAt to vPRAe and vPRAc to vPRAe, respectively. The median percentage of change in estimated number of match runs needed for 95% probability of finding an acceptable donor was significantly more pronounced by increasing vPRAt intervals, when considering the reclassification from vPRAt to vPRAe (P < 0.001) or vPRAc to vPRAe (P = 0.045), while from vPRAt to vPRAc it was not (P = 0.899). CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated that the use of total or current vPRA calculations are impairing HS patients, by decreasing transplant probability, leading to dramatically longer waiting times, when compared to eplet based vPRA.

HLA class II eplet mismatch load improves prediction of dnDSA development after living donor kidney transplantation.

HLA donor-specific antibodies developed de novo after transplant remain a major cause of chronic allograft dysfunction. Our study main purpose was to determine whether HLA MM, assessed traditionally and by HLA total and AbVer eplet mismatch load (EptMM and EpvMM) assessed with HLAMatchMaker, had impact on dnDSA development after living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT). We retrospectively analysed a cohort of 96 LDKT between 2008 and 2017 performed in Hospital Santo António. Seven patients developed dnDSA-II and EpvMM and EptMM were greater in dnDSA-II group compared to the no dnDSA-II (18.0 ± 8.7 versus 9.9 ± 7.9, p = .041 and 41.3 ± 18.9 versus 23.1 ± 16.7, p = .018), which is not observed for AgMM (2.29 versus 1.56; p = .09). In a multivariate analysis, we found that preformed DSA (HR = 7.983; p = .023), living unrelated donors (HR = 8.052; p = .024) and retransplantation (HR = 14.393; p = .009) were predictors for dnDSA-II (AUC = 0.801; 0.622-0.981). HLA-II EpvMM (HR = 1.105; p = .028; AUC = 0.856) showed to be a superior predictor of dnDSA-II, when compared to AgMM (HR = 1.740; p = .113; AUC = 0.783), when adjusted for these clinical variables. Graft survival was significantly lower within dnDSA-II patient group (36% versus 88%, p < .001). HLA molecular mismatch analysis is extremely important to minimize risk for HLA-II dnDSA development improving outcome and increasing chance of retransplant lowering allosensitization.

Lower donated kidney volume is associated with increased risk of lower graft function and acute rejection at 1 year after living donor kidney-a retrospective study.

Kidney volume has been proven to be a surrogate marker of nephron mass and renal function. We studied 190 donor and recipient pairs undergoing living donor kidney transplantation at our institution during 9 years. Different metrics of donor kidney volume (DKV) were explored: alone or indexed to recipient's anthropometry, as body surface area (BSA). DKV/BSA (min. 49.7; P33rd 77.7; P67th 95.3; max. 176 cm3 /m2 ) was chosen given its higher correlation with eGFR at 1 year, and recipients were divided according to its tertiles (T). The eGFR at 1 year was lower in T1, when compared with T2 (P = 0.015) and T3 (P < 0.001). In a multivariable model, a regression spline revealed that a DKV/BSA lower than 80 was significantly associated with an eGFR at 1 year <60. In the first 6 years, the overall annual eGFR slope was -0.90 ml/min/year. Acute rejection occurred in 19%, 11%, and 0% of patients in T1, T2, and T3, respectively (P < 0.001). DKV/BSA increased stepwise from cellular- (n = 12) to antibody-mediated (n = 7) AR cases and to those without AR (n = 171; P = 0.002; no AR versus cellular AR). Lower DKV/BSA ratio was associated with significantly worse graft function and higher incidence of AR. Hence, it can be a tool for better selection of donors in order to improve graft outcomes, particularly in the setting of multiple potential living donors or kidney paired exchange programs.

Remaining kidney volume indexed to weight as a strong predictor of estimated glomerular filtration rate at 1 year and mid-term renal function after living-donor nephrectomy - a retrospective observational study.

The donors' estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) after living nephrectomy has been a concern, particularly in donors with smaller kindeys. Therefore, we developed this retrospective observational study in 195 donors to determine the ability remaining kidney volume indexed to weight (RKV/W) to predict eGFR at 1 year through multivariate linear regression and to explore this relationship between annual eGFR change from 1 to 4 years postdonation evaluated by a linear mixed model. Comparing RKV/W tertiles (T1, T2, T3), RKV/W was a good predictor of 1-year eGFR which was significantly better in T3 donors. Gender, predonation eGFR, and RKV/W were independent predictors of eGFR at 1-year. In a subgroup with predonation eGFR < 90mL/min/1.73 m2 , a significant prediction of eGFR < 60mL/min/1.73 m2 was detected in males with RKV/W ≤ 2.51cm3 /kg. Annual eGFR (ml/min/year) change from 1 to 4 years was + 0.77. RKV/W divided by tertiles (T1-T3) was the only significant predictor: T2 and T3 donors had an annual eGFR improvement opposing to T1. RKV/W was a good predictor of eGFR at 1 year, independently from predonation eGFR. A higher RKV/W was associated with improved eGFR at 1 year. A decline in eGFR on the four years after surgery was only noticeable in donors with RKV/W ≤ 2.13cm3 /kg.

Degree of HLA class II eplet mismatch load improves prediction of antibody-mediated rejection in living donor kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND: HLA mismatching is a well known risk factor for worst outcomes in kidney transplantation. METHODS: In the present study, HLA antigen and eplet mismatches were determined in 151 living donor-recipient pairs transplanted between 2007 and 2014 and rejection episodes and graft survival were evaluated. RESULTS: We found that high HLA-II eplet mismatch load (EpMM ≥ 13, versus low EpMM ≤ 5), was an independent predictor of AMR (adjusted HR = 14.839; P = 0.011), while HLA-II AgMM was not. We also showed that HLA-II EpMM load was a significant better predictor of AMR than AgMM (c-statistic = 0.064; P = 0.023). After discriminating HLA-II into HLA-DR and HLA-DQ loci we demonstrated that high versus low eplet mismatch load for HLA-DR (T3 ≥ 6 versus T = 0-1, p = 0.013) and HLA-DQ (T3 ≥ 7 versus T = 0-1, p = 0.009) are independent predictors for AMR. HLA-II EpMM increased discrimination performance of the classical HLA-II AgMM risk model (IDI, 0.061, 95%CI: 0.005-0.195) for AMR. Compared with AgMM, HLA-II eplet model adequately reclassified 13 of 17 patients (76.5%) with AMR and 92 of 134 patients (68.7%) without AMR (cfNRI, 0.785, 95%CI: 0.300-1.426). CONCLUSIONS: Our study evidences that eplet-based matching is a refinement of the classical HLA antigen mismatch analysis in LDKT and is a potential biomarker for personalized assessment of alloimmune risk.

Mini-incision Living Donor Nephrectomy and Trans-peritoneal Laparoscopic Nephrectomy: Will There Be a Place for New Evidence?

OBJECTIVES: To compare mini-incision donor nephrectomy (MDN) with laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) performed by the same surgical team, regarding short- and long-term outcomes. METHODS: Three hundred and five patients, who underwent donor nephrectomy in our institution, through an MDN (n = 141) between January 1998-November 2011 and LDN (n = 164) since June 2010-December 2017, were compared. RESULTS: The mean operative time for MDN (120 ± 29 minutes) was not significantly different when compared to LDN (113 ± 34 minutes), but when comparing the first 50 LDN and the 50 most recent, we found a reduction in the duration of the procedure. Laparoscopic donors had a shorter warm ischemia time (229 seconds vs 310 seconds, P = .01), particularly the 50 most recent, hospital stay (4.3 days vs 5.9 days, P < .001), and postoperative complications (P = .03). The incidence of graft acute tubular necrosis (ATN) was superior in the MDN (89% vs 25%, P < .001), although there was no significant difference regarding first-year serum creatinine (SCr) and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (SCr 1.38 mg/dL vs SCr 1.33 mg/dL and GFR 63.7 mL/min vs 63.1 mL/min) comparing the 2 groups. Long-term graft survival did not significantly differ between groups. There was also no relationship between postoperative ATN events and long-term graft function. CONCLUSIONS: With the growing experience of the high-volume centers and with specialized teams, LDN could be considered the most suitable technique for living donor nephrectomy with better results in short-term results (warm ischemia time, hospital stay, and postoperative complications), without difference in long-term outcomes.

Adenovirus infection-A rare cause of interstitial nephritis in kidney transplant / Infección por adenovirus: una causa poco frecuente de nefritis intersticial en el trasplante de riñón

No disponible

Deleterious effect of anti-angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies detected pretransplant on kidney graft outcomes is both proper and synergistic with donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies.

AIM: Both donor-specific antibodies (DSA) and anti-angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies (AT1R-abs) have been associated with poor graft outcomes after kidney transplantation (KT). We aimed to understand the impact of pretransplant AT1R-abs with or without concomitant DSA on KT outcomes. METHODS: Seventy-six patients transplanted in 2009 were studied. DSA (MFI > 1000) and/or AT1R-abs (>10UI) were detected by solid-phase assays in pre-KT sera. Multivariable Cox regression models were used to determine independent predictors of outcomes: acute rejection (AR) and graft failure. RESULTS: At transplant, 48 patients were AT1R-abs (-)/DSA (-), 12 AT1R-abs (+)/DSA (-), 9 AT1R-abs (-)/DSA (+) and 7 AT1R-abs (+)/DSA (+). Incidence of acute rejection at 1-year increased from 6% in AT1R-abs (-)/DSA (-), to 35% in AT1R-abs (+)/DSA (-), 47% in AT1R-abs (-)/DSA (+) and 43% in AT1R-abs (+)/DSA (+) (P < 0.001). No difference in DSA strength and C1q-binding ability was observed between AT1R-abs (-) /DSA (+) and AT1R-abs (+)/DSA (+) patients. Graft survival at 6-years was the lowest in AT1R-abs (+)/DSA (+) (57%), followed by AT1R-abs (+)/DSA (-) (67%), and higher in AT1R-abs (-)/DSA (-) (94%) and AT1R-abs (-)/DSA (+) (89%) patients (P = 0.012). AT1R-abs (+)/DSA (-) (HR = 6.41, 95% CI: 1.43-28.68; P = 0.015) and AT1R-abs (+)/DSA (+) (HR = 7.75, 95% CI: 1.56-38.46; P = 0.012) were independent predictors of graft failure. CONCLUSION: Acute rejection incidence and graft failure were associated with both DSA and AT1R-abs. These results demonstrate a proper negative effect of AT1R-abs on graft outcomes, besides a synergistic one with DSA. Pretransplant AT1R-abs should be acknowledged to better stratify patients' immunological risk.

Detection of Complement-binding Donor-specific Antibodies, Not IgG-antibody Strength Nor C4d Status, at Antibody-mediated Rejection Diagnosis Is an Independent Predictor of Kidney Graft Failure.

BACKGROUND: Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) remains associated with reduced kidney graft survival and no clear prognostic marker is available. METHODS: We investigated whether donor-specific antibodies (DSA) ability to bind C1q in comparison with AMR C4d status, both indirect signs of complement activation, improve risk stratification at time of AMR. Hence, among 467 patients in whom 1 or more graft biopsies were performed between 2008 and 2015, we included 56 with AMR according to Banff '15 criteria. Using concurrent sera, we prospectively identified DSA by single-antigen beads (IgG and C1q) assays. RESULTS: Antibody-mediated rejection C4d (+) (n = 28) was associated with preformed DSA (P = 0.007), whereas DSA C1q (+) (n = 25) cases had stronger IgG-DSA (P < 0.001). At AMR, graft function was similar between DSA C1q groups, but in the first year after, it improved in DSA C1q (-), whereas a steady decline was observed in DSA C1q (+) cases, remaining significantly lower from 1 year until 4 years after AMR. DSA C1q (+) was significantly associated with reduced graft survival (P = 0.021), whereas AMR C4d (+) was not (P = 0.550). Importantly, a similar negative impact of DSA C1q (+) on graft survival was observed within AMR C4d (+) (P = 0.040) and (-) (P = 0.036), cases. In multivariable analysis, DSA C1q (+) (hazard ratio, 3.939, P = 0.005) and de novo DSA (hazard ratio, 4.409, P = 0.033) were independent predictors of graft failure, but stronger IgG-DSA was not. Similar results were obtained considering C1q-DSA and IgG-DSA strength as continuous variables. CONCLUSIONS: C1q-DSA assessment at AMR can be a valuable tool in detecting patients with higher risk of graft failure.

Correlations between donor-specific antibodies and non-adherence with chronic active antibody-mediated rejection phenotypes and their impact on kidney graft survival.

Chronic-active antibody-mediated rejection (CAABMR) is associated with poor kidney graft survival and has no clear effective treatment. Forty-one cases of CAABMR were detected in indication graft biopsies and evaluated according to current Banff classification. We investigated the impact of concurrent donor-specific antibodies (DSA) and their characteristics, together with non-adherence regarding immunosuppression on CAABMR histopathological phenotypes and prognosis. Twenty-four (59%) patients had detectable DSA at biopsy, with 15 of them being considered non-adherent. Graft function at biopsy was similar in DSA (+) and (-) patients. DSA (+) patients had significantly higher tubulointerstitial inflammation (i and ti) and acute humoral (g+ptc+v+C4d) composite score than DSA (-). DSA (+)/non-adherent cases presented additionally with increased microvascular inflammation (ptc and v), besides having a distinctively lower ah score. C1q DSA strength was higher (P = .046) in non-adherent patients and correlated closely with C4d score (P = .002). Lower graft function and ah score, higher proteinuria and ci + ct score, and, separately per each model, DSA (+) (HR = 2.446, P = .034), DSA (+)/non-adherent (HR = 3.657, P = .005) and DSA (+)/C1q (+) (HR = 4.831, P = .003) status were independent predictors of graft failure. CAABMR with concomitant DSA pose a higher risk of graft failure. Adherence should be evaluated, and histopathological phenotyping and DSA characterization may add critical information.

Impact on mid-term kidney graft outcomes of pretransplant anti-HLA antibodies detected by solid-phase assays: Do donor-specific antibodies tell the whole story?

The detrimental impact of preformed anti-HLA donor-specific antibodies (DSA) is well defined, contrarily to non-donor-specific antibodies (NDSA). We sought to evaluate their clinical impact in a cohort of 724 kidney graft recipients in whom anti-HLA antibodies were thoroughly screened and identified in pre-transplant sera by solid-phase assays. NDSA or DSA were detected in 100 (13.8%) and 47 (6.5%) recipients respectively, while 577 (79.7%) were non-allosensitized (NaS). Incidence of antibody-mediated rejection at 1-year was 0.7%, 4.0% and 25.5% in NaS, NDSA and DSA patients, respectively (NaS vs. NDSA P=0.004; NaS vs. DSA P<0.001; NDSA vs. DSA P<0.001). Graft survival was lowest in DSA (78.7%), followed by NDSA (88.0%) and NaS (93.8%) recipients (NaS vs. NDSA P=0.015; NaS vs. DSA P<0.001; NDSA vs. DSA P=0.378). Multivariable competing risk analysis confirmed both NDSA (sHR=2.19; P=0.025) and DSA (sHR=2.87; P=0.012) as significant predictors of graft failure. The negative effect of NDSA and DSA on graft survival was significant in patients receiving no induction (P=0.019) or an anti-IL-2 receptor antibody (P<0.001), but not in those receiving anti-thymocyte globulin (P=0.852). The recognition of the immunological risk associated with preformed DSA but also NDSA have important implications in patients' risk stratification, and may impact clinical decisions at transplant.

Determining donor-specific antibody C1q-binding ability improves the prediction of antibody-mediated rejection in human leucocyte antigen-incompatible kidney transplantation.

Detrimental impact of preformed donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) against human leucocyte antigens on outcomes after kidney transplantation are well documented, however, the value of their capacity to bind complement for predicting antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) and graft survival still needs to be confirmed. We aimed to study DSA characteristics (strength and C1q binding) that might distinguish harmful DSA from clinically irrelevant ones. We retrospectively studied 60 kidney-transplanted patients with preformed DSA detected by single antigen bead (SAB) assays (IgG and C1q kits), from a cohort of 517 kidney graft recipients (124 with detectable anti-HLA antibodies). Patients were divided into DSA strength (MFI < vs. ≥ 15 000) and C1q-binding ability. AMR frequency was high (30%) and it increased with DSA strength (P = 0.002) and C1q+ DSA (P < 0.001). The performance of DSA C1q-binding ability as a predictor of AMR was better than DSA strength (diagnostic odds ratio 16.3 vs. 6.4, respectively). Furthermore, a multivariable logistic regression showed that C1q+ DSA was a risk factor for AMR (OR = 16.80, P = 0.001), while high MFI DSAs were not. Graft survival was lower in high MFI C1q+ DSA in comparison with patients with C1q- high or low MFI DSA (at 6 years, 38%, 83% and 80%, respectively; P = 0.001). Both DSA strength and C1q-binding ability assessment seem valuable for improving pretransplant risk assessment. Since DSA C1q-binding ability was a better predictor of AMR and correlated with graft survival, C1q-SAB may be a particularly useful tool.

Impact of de novo donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies on grafts outcomes in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation.

De novo donor-specific antibodies (dDSA) relevance in simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplantation has been scarcely investigated. We analyzed dDSA relationship with grafts outcomes in a long-term follow-up SPK-transplanted cohort. In 150 patients that received SPK transplant between 2000 and 2013, post-transplant anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies were screened and identified using Luminex-based assays in sera collected at 3, 6, and 12 months, then yearly. dDSA were detected in 22 (14.7%) patients at a median 3.1 years after transplant. Pretransplant anti-HLA sensitization (OR = 4.64), full HLA-DR mismatch (OR = 4.38), and previous acute cellular rejection (OR = 9.45) were significant risk factors for dDSA. dDSA were significantly associated with kidney (in association with acute rejection) and pancreas graft failure. In dDSA+ patients, those with at least one graft failure presented more frequently dDSA against class II or I + II (P = 0.011) and locusDQ (P = 0.043) and had a higher median dDSA number (P = 0.014) and strength (P = 0.030). Median time between dDSA emergence and pancreas and kidney graft failure was 5 and 12 months, respectively. Emergence of dDSA increased the risk of grafts failure in SPK-transplanted patients. Full HLA-DR mismatch was associated with dDSA emergence. dDSA characteristics might help identify patients at a higher risk of graft failure.

Homozygosity for the E526V Mutation in Fibrinogen A Alpha-Chain Amyloidosis: The First Report.

Systemic hereditary amyloidoses are autosomal dominant diseases associated with mutations in genes encoding ten different proteins. The clinical phenotype has implications on therapeutic approach, but it is commonly variable and largely dependent on the type of mutation. Except for rare cases involving gelsolin or transthyretin, patients are heterozygous for the amyloidogenic variants. Here we describe the first patient identified worldwide as homozygous for a nephropathic amyloidosis, involving the fibrinogen variant associated with the fibrinogen alpha-chain E526V (p.Glu545Val) mutation. In 1989, a 44-year-old woman presented with hypertension, hepatosplenomegaly, nephrotic syndrome, and renal failure. She started hemodialysis in 1990 and 6 years later underwent isolated kidney transplantation from a deceased donor. Graft function and clinical status were unremarkable for 16 years, despite progressively increased left ventricular mass on echocardiography. In 2012, 4 months before death, she deteriorated rapidly with severe heart failure, precipitated by Clostridium difficile colitis and urosepsis. Affected family members developed nephropathy, on average, nearly three decades later, which may be explained by the gene dosage effects on the phenotype of E526V (p.Glu545Val) fibrinogen A alpha-chain amyloidosis.

CT-based renal volume and graft function after living-donor kidney transplantation: Is there a volume threshold to avoid?

PURPOSE: Donated kidney volume influences post-transplant outcomes and graft survival. We evaluated the relationship between living-donor kidney volume and recipient graft function at 12 months post-transplantation, exploring a volume threshold for a suboptimal graft function, and compared two different formulas of volume estimation. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 82 pairs of living-donor kidney transplants was conducted. Donor renal volumes were estimated from computerized tomography scans using the ellipsoid formula and the voxel counting technique. Linear and restricted cubic regression spline was used to analyze the association of volume with graft function. Additionally, we determined the correlation between the two volume estimation formulas and established a correction factor for the ellipsoid formula. RESULTS: Renal volume (adjusted to recipient BSA) had the strongest independent effect (B = 1.65 per 10 ml/m(2) increase, p value <0.001) on graft function at 12 months. The eGFR at 12 months was 52.5, 63.6 and 67.6 ml/min/1.73 m(2) for the low, medium and high volume ratio terciles, respectively (p value <0.001). The odds of a GFR <50 ml/min became significantly reduced with volumes above 145 cc/1.73 m(2). A strong positive correlation between the two formulas was identified (R(2) = 0.705), but the optimal correction factor for our cohort was 0.566. CONCLUSIONS: In a Caucasian population, higher donor kidney volumes estimated from preoperative CT scans are associated with higher recipient eGFRs at 12 months after live-donor transplantation. Using this criterion, transplant teams can potentially improve selection of living donors if multiple donors are available. However, the need for precise estimation of donor kidney volumes should not be overlooked.

Analysis of preformed donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies characteristics for prediction of antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The relevance of preformed donor specific antibodies (DSA) detected by Luminex assays, with a negative complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) crossmatch, remains unsettled in kidney transplantation (KT). We aimed to analyze the impact of preformed DSA characteristics on kidney graft outcomes. METHODS: In 462 patients that received a kidney graft in our unit, between 2007 and 2012, pre-transplant sera were analyzed by Luminex screening assay to determine the presence of anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies and single-antigen bead assay [positive if mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) ≥ 1000] to assign anti-HLA specificities. RESULTS: Anti-HLA antibodies were present in 95 patients (20.6%), but only 40 (8.7%) had DSA. Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) at 1-year was higher in patients with DSA (35.0%) than in those without them (0.9%) (P < 0.001). Only DSA with a MFI of >3000 were significantly associated with AMR occurrence. Receiver operator curves revealed that a MFI of >4900 in the highest DSA bead had a high sensitivity (85.7%) and that the sum of all DSA beads MFI > 11,000 had a high specificity (92.3%) for AMR prediction. Anti-thymocyte globulin versus basiliximab induction was more frequent in DSA+ AMR- (65.4%) versus DSA+ AMR+ (34.6%) patients (P = 0.072). Five-year censored graft survival was lower in DSA+ than in DSA- patients (respectively, 84.8% versus 94.9%, P = 0.006), although survival was only reduced in DSA+ AMR+ (68.8%) versus DSA+ AMR- (96.0%) patients (P = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: Preformed DSA is associated with kidney graft loss, in relation with AMR occurrence. DSA strength may be used to improve immunological risk stratification of sensitized patients and their clinical management.

The effect of delayed graft function on graft and patient survival in kidney transplantation: an approach using competing events analysis.

OBJECTIVE: In kidney transplantation, the impact of delayed graft function (DGF) on long-term graft and patient survival is controversial. We examined the impact of DGF on graft and recipient survival by accounting for the possibility that death with graft function may act as a competing risk for allograft failure. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We used data from 1281 adult primary deceased-donor kidney recipients whose allografts functioned at least 1 year. RESULTS: The probability of graft loss occurrence is overestimated using the complement of Kaplan-Meier estimates (1-KM). Both the cause-specific Cox proportional hazard regression model (standard Cox) and the subdistribution hazard regression model proposed by Fine and Gray showed that DGF was associated with shorter time to graft failure (csHR = 2.0, P = 0.002; sHR = 1.57, P = 0.009), independent of acute rejection (AR) and after adjusting for traditional factors associated with graft failure. Regarding patient survival, DGF was a predictor of patient death using the cause-specific Cox model (csHR = 1.57, P = 0.029) but not using the subdistribution model. CONCLUSIONS: The probability of graft loss from competing end points should not be reported with the 1-KM. Application of a regression model for subdistribution hazard showed that, independent of AR, DGF has a detrimental effect on long-term graft survival, but not on patient survival.

An uncommon cause of linfadenopathy in a kidney transplant patient: Cat-scratch disease

No disponible

Posttransplant allosensitization in low immunological risk kidney and kidney-pancreas graft recipients.

INTRODUCTION: Posttransplantation allosensitization prevalence and effect on kidney grafts outcomes remain unsettled. METHODS: Between 2007 and 2012, 408 patients received a primary kidney graft (with 68 patients also receiving a pancreas graft) after a negative cytotoxic crossmatch. All patients had a pretransplant negative anti-HLA screening and 0% panel reactive antibodies. We analyzed retrospectively the results of anti-HLA antibodies screening by Luminex assay, performed between 6 and 24 months after transplant, and searched for the risk factors for antibody positivity and its impact on kidney graft outcomes. RESULTS: Anti-HLA antibodies prevalence at 6 months was 17.4%. Previous steroid-insensitive acute rejection was the only risk factor for both anti-HLA classes detected antibodies. Antithymocyte globulin induction was also a risk factor for anti-HLA-I antibodies. Antibody positivity status was associated with reduced graft function at 12 months and graft survival at 5 years (91.5% versus 96.4%, P = 0.03). In multivariable Cox analysis, delayed graft function (HR = 6.1, P < 0.01), HLA mismatches >3 (HR = 10.2, P = 0.03), and antibody positivity for anti-HLA class II (HR = 5.1, P = 0.04) or class I/II (HR = 13.8, P < 0.01) were independent predictors of graft loss. CONCLUSIONS: Allosensitization against HLA class II ± I after transplant was associated with adverse kidney graft outcomes. A screening protocol seems advisable within the first year in low immunological risk patients.